e-Learning Ecologies MOOC’s Updates
Collaborative Intelligence - Social Dimensions of Learning
Collaborative Intelligence—where, for instance, peers offer structured feedback to each other, available knowledge resources are diverse and open, and the contributions of peers and sources to knowledge formation are documented and transparent. This builds soft skills of collaboration and negotiation necessary for complex, diverse world. It focuses on learning as social activity rather than learning as individual memory.
Comment: Make a comment below this update about the ways in which educational technologies can support collaborative intelligence. Respond to others' comments with @name.
Post an Update: Make an update introducing a collaborative intelligence concept on the community page. Define the concept and provide at least one example of the concept in practice. Be sure to add links or other references, and images or other media to illustrate your point. If possible, select a concept that nobody has addressed yet so we get a well-balanced view of collaborative intelligence. Also, comment on at least three or four updates by other participants. Collaborative intelligence concepts might include:
- Distributed intelligence
- Crowdsourcing
- Collective intelligence
- Situated cognition
- Peer-to-peer learning
- Communities of practice
- Socratic dialogue
- Community and collaboration tools
- Wikis
- Blogs
- Suggest a concept in need of definition!
الطرق التكنولوجية لدعم الذكاء التعاوني
1- أدوات الاتصال والتعاون الرقمي
• منصات الاجتماعات الافتراضية: مثل Zoom, Microsoft Teams, Google Meet، التي تسمح بالاتصال الفوري وعقد الاجتماعات عن بُعد.
• تطبيقات الدردشة الفورية: مثل Slack, Discord, WhatsApp Business، التي تتيح تبادل الأفكار والتواصل بين الفرق بسهولة.
• البريد الإلكتروني التعاوني: مثل Gmail, Outlook، حيث يمكن تنظيم المحادثات وتبادل المعلومات في بيئة منظمة.
2- أدوات إدارة المشاريع والمهام
• تطبيقات إدارة المشاريع: مثل Trello, Asana, Monday.com، حيث يتمكن الفريق من إدارة المهام، تعيين المسؤوليات، وتتبع التقدم.
• أنظمة تخطيط موارد المؤسسات (ERP): مثل SAP, Oracle NetSuite، التي تساعد في تحسين التنسيق بين الأقسام المختلفة داخل المؤسسة.
• منصات العمل التعاوني: مثل Notion, ClickUp, Basecamp، التي تدمج إدارة المشاريع مع مستندات التعاون والاتصالات.
3- . تقنيات الذكاء الاصطناعي (AI) وتحليل البيانات
• روبوتات الدردشة الذكية (Chatbots): مثل ChatGPT, IBM Watson Assistant، التي توفر المساعدة الفورية للمجموعات في اتخاذ القرارات وحل المشكلات.
• تحليل البيانات الضخمة (Big Data Analytics): تساعد في استخراج رؤى من كميات هائلة من البيانات لتعزيز القرارات الجماعية.
• أنظمة التوصية (Recommendation Systems): تُستخدم في بيئات العمل التعاوني لاقتراح محتوى أو استراتيجيات بناءً على أنماط السلوك السابقة.
4- منصات العمل المشترك والمحتوى الجماعي
• محررات المستندات التعاونية: مثل Google Docs, Microsoft Office 365, Dropbox Paper، التي تسمح للمستخدمين بتعديل النصوص والجداول والشرائح معًا.
• المنصات التعليمية التشاركية: مثل Khan Academy, Coursera, Moodle، التي تمكن الطلاب والمدربين من التعلم معًا في بيئة افتراضية.
• ويكي الشركات والمجتمعات التعاونية: مثل Wikipedia, Confluence, SharePoint، حيث يمكن إنشاء مستودعات معرفية جماعية يمكن للأعضاء تحديثها وتحريرها باستمرار.
5- تقنيات الواقع الافتراضي (VR) والواقع المعزز (AR)
• الاجتماعات الافتراضية في بيئات VR: مثل Horizon Workrooms (Meta), Spatial, Virbela، التي توفر بيئات ثلاثية الأبعاد للتعاون التفاعلي.
• التدريب التعاوني باستخدام الواقع المعزز: تستخدم الشركات مثل Boeing, Siemens الواقع المعزز لتدريب الفرق الهندسية والعاملين في التصنيع بشكل تعاوني.
6- البلوك تشين (Blockchain) لتعزيز الشفافية والتعاون
• العقود الذكية (Smart Contracts): التي تضمن تنفيذ الاتفاقات التعاونية بشكل تلقائي دون الحاجة إلى وسيط.
• اللامركزية في إدارة المعلومات: حيث تتيح تقنية البلوك تشين تخزين المعلومات المشتركة دون تحكم مركزي، مما يعزز التعاون الآمن بين الأفراد والمؤسسات.
A wiki is an online tool that simplifies the sharing and organization of information. It comprises a collection of interconnected web pages, enabling users to navigate between topics effortlessly through hyperlinks. Wikis are known for their ease of use and adaptability, making them valuable for internal collaboration within organizations and for external, public-facing purposes.
Wikis can act as a centralized repository for company-wide resources, serving as a digital filing system where essential information is stored and easily accessible. They are collaborative, easy to update, secure, and require minimal setup—qualities that make them ideal for digital workspaces.
Internal and External Wikis
Wikis can be categorized based on their purpose and audience:
• Internal Wikis: Used by organizations for sharing sensitive or operational information among employees. They foster team collaboration, store company guidelines, and facilitate updates on projects in a secure environment.
• External Wikis: Designed for public access, these wikis are commonly used for sharing product details, support materials, or open-source project documentation with wider audiences.
Examples of Wiki Content
Here are some types of information that can be stored in an internal wiki:
• How-to guides and tutorials
• Meeting notes and company policies
• Project plans, timelines, and analyses
• Frequently asked questions (FAQs) and customer service resources
• Team directories and organizational charts
• Employee handbooks and best practices
Steps to Create a Wiki
1. Define the Wiki Type
Decide whether the wiki will be internal (for organizational use) or external (for public access). Internal wikis focus on secure collaboration, while external ones share information openly.
2. Choose a Platform
Select wiki software based on your needs. Popular options include:
o MediaWiki: Open-source and ideal for large-scale projects.
o DokuWiki: Lightweight and user-friendly for small teams.
o Tettra: Premium software with enhanced tools for ease of use.
3. Set Security and Guidelines
Collaborate with IT to ensure compliance with security policies and establish rules for editing and content management to maintain accuracy and relevance.
4. Organize and Add Content
Structure the wiki with clear categories and tags. Use simple language, visuals, and hyperlinks for easy navigation. Start with broad topics and refine as the wiki grows.
5. Assign Roles and Permissions
Grant appropriate editing rights to different teams or individuals. This ensures that contributors only modify relevant sections, preventing unauthorized changes
By following these steps, organizations and individuals can create efficient and organized wikis tailored to their specific needs. Would you like additional guidance or recommendations for wiki software or examples? Let me know!
references
https://blog.hubspot.com/website/what-is-a-wiki
https://youtu.be/4C3nnnSmXvk?si=Ee42ApgrATV-5-4M
https://youtu.be/o5HijgcZ0bc?si=m0HoYeKtleLGaz82
Collaborative intelligence encourages creating dynamic opportunities for learning communities to collaboratively create, refine, and share knowledge that models authentic learning experiences to prepare learners for educational growth and lifelong learning. In this model, intelligence is distributed amongst individuals and environments, and this is accomplished through social interactions rather than at the individual memorization of content. From this perspective, intelligence emerges through collaborative activities and by connections and interactions Collaborative intelligence involves promoting “a culture of knowledge sourcing and developing skills and strategies for knowledge collaboration and social learning”. The central idea behind collaborative intelligence is that knowledge and understanding are deeply rooted and enhanced by social interactions and that it relies on a network of connections.
Principles of collaborative intelligence:
1. Teamwork leads to greater results than individual efforts.
2. Connection is essential for team success.
3. Collaboration cannot be left to chance.
4. Collaboration spaces empower linked teams.
5. Measuring collaboration is achievable and necessary.
For example: Peer-to-peer learning platforms with AI support, where students work together on projects with the aid of AI tools, are a particular example of collaborative intelligence in e-learning. Peergrade and Perusall are two platforms that allow students to annotate literature collaboratively, give feedback to their peers, and improve their comprehension through facilitated discussions.
Students annotate course readings using Perusall in a blended learning environment. AI systems draw attention to potential areas of community ignorance, encouraging cooperative dialogue. For instance, students in a history course work together to analyze a document from a primary source. A third student improves the group's view in light of peer input after one student draws attention to bias and another connects it to larger historical contexts. The AI highlights areas of misunderstanding, makes sure everyone is contributing in a meaningful way, and encourages the group .
References:
https://www.jenniferchangwathall.com/single-post/collaborative-intelligence-in-digital-environments
https://www.mural.co/blog/collaborative-intelligence-vs-collective-intelligence
https://qafilah.com/%D9%86%D8%B8%D8%B1%D9%8A%D8%A9-%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%AA%D8%B9%D9%84%D9%85-%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%AA%D8%B9%D8%A7%D9%88%D9%86%D9%8A/
Competency-based assessment, which prioritises success over failure, can help improve student results. Even so, competences can be difficult to assess and test. Bearing in mind that we're talking about e-learning environments, where we've already seen in previous modules that students can be anywhere at any time and with any device, with the online always present, I'd like to recommend reading Digcomp - a European framework of digital competences which I believe should be transversal to the subjects and activities on offer.
Digcomp link: https://joint-research-centre.ec.europa.eu/scientific-activities-z/education-and-training/digital-transformation-education/digital-competence-framework-citizens-digcomp_en
Socratic Dialouge
I think feedback can be one of the means of teaching students in an environment where the teacher is not present, not just for correcting them. Through giving feedback, students can become familiar with new concepts and build their knowledge. Through digital learning, feedback can facilitate learning, and there would be collective ideas where students can learn from one another. One example of giving feedback can be through Socratic dialogue. This is what I usually do in my classes. Due to time constraints, I have them answer the critical guided questions in their Telegram group. There are a lot of ideas generated by different students who can read them, leading to a communal decision on what is the best answer to the question. Then, I provide them with a reading passage. As they have already been challenged by different questions, they can answer the reading comprehension questions better. Ultimately, the feedback, their cooperation, and the Socratic dialogue in the learning process will help them build their knowledge.
Socratic dialogue, also known as Socratic questioning or the Socratic method, is a method of inquiry and discussion developed by the ancient Greek philosopher Socrates. It involves a process of questioning and critical thinking to stimulate intellectual exploration, uncover deeper insights, and encourage the development of rational arguments.
In a Socratic dialogue, the focus is on open-ended questioning rather than providing direct answers. The goal is to prompt participants to examine their beliefs, assumptions, and reasoning, leading to a deeper understanding of a particular topic or problem. The Socratic method is often used in educational settings, such as classrooms or seminars, to foster critical thinking and active engagement with the material.
Here's an example of a Socratic dialogue in an educational setting, specifically in a high school literature class discussing the theme of justice in a novel:
Teacher: Today, let's delve into the theme of justice in the novel we've been studying. What are your initial thoughts on the concept of justice as portrayed in the story?
Student 1: I think justice means fair punishment for wrongdoing. It's about making sure that people pay for their actions.
Teacher: Interesting perspective. So, justice, for you, is primarily about punishment. Can you think of a specific instance in the novel where this idea of justice is explored?
Student 1: Well, there's a scene where the protagonist seeks revenge on the antagonist for an injustice done to their family. It shows that justice is about getting even.
Teacher: That's an important point. Revenge can be seen as a form of justice in some contexts. Now, let's consider an alternative perspective. Does anyone have a different interpretation of justice in the novel?
Student 2: I believe justice is more than just punishment. It's about restoring balance and righting the wrongs. It's about fairness and equality.
Teacher: Excellent point. Can you provide an example from the novel that supports this view of justice?
Student 2: Yes, there's a scene where a character who was falsely accused of a crime is finally exonerated and receives compensation for their suffering. It shows that justice is about repairing the harm caused.
Teacher: Good observation. So, justice, according to your interpretation, involves not only punishment but also restoring balance and compensating for injustices. Now, let's challenge these perspectives. Can anyone think of a situation in the novel where justice seems ambiguous or elusive?
Student 3: I remember a scene where two characters engage in a morally gray act to achieve what they perceive as justice. It raises questions about the boundaries of justice and whether the end justifies the means.
Teacher: Excellent observation. This highlights the complexities of justice and the ethical dilemmas that arise. Is justice always black and white, or are there shades of gray? Now, let's explore the consequences of different notions of justice. How might the story have unfolded if a different understanding of justice prevailed?
And the dialogue would continue, with the teacher asking further questions to encourage critical thinking, exploration of different perspectives, and a deeper understanding of the theme of justice in the novel.
الذكاء التعاوني
الذكاء التعاوني
Let's dive into the exciting world of Collaborative Intelligence! This concept is all about tapping into the collective brainpower of a group to achieve remarkable results. In today's interconnected age, working together can produce insights and solutions that go beyond what any individual can accomplish.
Defining Collaborative Intelligence:
Collaborative Intelligence is like the secret sauce of teamwork. It's the magic that happens when diverse minds join forces, creating a sum that's greater than its parts. It's the understanding that working together can lead to brilliant outcomes, and in education, it opens doors to innovative learning approaches.
Example in Practice:
Imagine a global community of educators, learners, and experts collaborating on a platform like XYZ Crowdsourcing. Here, everyone contributes their expertise to create diverse and top-notch educational materials. It's like a knowledge potluck where the variety of ideas ensures a buffet of learning resources for different tastes and preferences.
Engage with the Concept:
I'm eager to hear your take on Collaborative Intelligence! Have you experienced it in your teaching or learning journey? Do you use tools like wikis, blogs, or online communities to enhance collaboration? Share your insights, stories, or even a favorite collaborative tool that spices up your learning adventures.
Distributed Intelligence
The dominant assumption that intelligence is individualistic and personal is changing with the ever-increasing technology. According to Gregory Bateson ‘memory is half in mind and half in the world”. Knowledge and education are socially constructed and embedded in artefacts, products, tools, symbols, landmarks in environments, and human interactions with these constructions.
The basic idea of distributed thinking emerges from activity or thinking of people in action. There are two aspects of intelligence, social and material; student-teacher interaction is social, and the material aspect can be exploitation of design objects or artifact. Tools serve as artifacts for distributed intelligence. Let’s take the example of pen and paper also computer displays cannot be denied for dissemination of knowledge. Better design makes interaction and usability easy and convenient. Though primacy is given to humans and their actions, in distributed intelligence the objects, tools and artifacts carry intelligence in them as they represent some individual’s or community’s decision for usage. Problem finding is an example of social construction. We use objects artifacts for problem representation, for example egg crate for counting eggs.
Knowledge of any kind has to do with humans’ efforts to make sense of the world or the situation they are in. With social and material aspects of intelligence one key factor behind humans’ activities is desire. Their desire shapes both their interpretation and their usage of the resources. We are not static, we think, desire, create and innovate things. Generally, design is a problem-solving activity and desire drives us to strive for what we are looking for as the best possible solution for a problem. In this effort to solve problems and the constant struggle to make sense of the world around us pushes us to share knowledge with other human beings. One of the key functions of design is to make knowledge sharing convenient and comprehendible. Graphic representation, visualization, maps, info graphics are essential examples of distributed intelligence – now the realm is expanding with virtual reality, stimulation, 3D modeling and advanced image projection. The interpretations of social realities in virtual setups such as social media and collaborative platforms for sharing knowledge are also examples of distributed intelligence. Which includes both material and social aspects we discussed earlier. The role of designers in this distribution of intelligence is undeniable.
References:
Distributed Intelligence in Design, Wiley, February 2011, UK. ISBN: 978-1-4443-3338-1
Distributed Cognitions: Psychological and Educational Considerations edited by Gavriel Salomon Cambridge University Press 1993